The vast majority of these proposed universes disappeared without a trace; only a minuscule fraction of them blended to make the current Universe. Hawking and Hertog insist that if we are to take quantum physics seriously, we must conclude that there is no single history. We should picture the Universe in the first instants of the Big Bang, they say, as a superposition of all cosmological possibilities.

Excerpt from Nature:

He and Hawking call their theory 'top-down' cosmology, because instead of looking for some fundamental set of initial physical laws under which our Universe unfolded, it starts 'at the top', with what we see today, and works backwards to see what the initial set of possibilities might have been. In effect, says Hertog, the present 'selects' the past.What's fascinating about this theory is that, by extension, it may be transferable to individual observers. By applying a stronger variant of the anthropic principle, one could argue that the cosmos has structured itself around your very own existence.

Within just a few seconds after the Big Bang, a single history had already come to dominate the Universe, he explains. So from the 'classical' viewpoint of big objects such as stars and galaxies, things happened only one way after that point. Other 'histories', say, one in which the Earth formed only 4,000 years ago, have made no significant contribution to this cosmic evolution.

But in the first instants of the Big Bang, there existed a superposition of ever more different versions of the Universe, instead of a unique history. And most crucially, Hertog says that "our current Universe has features frozen in from this early quantum mixture".

In other words, some of these alternative histories have left their imprint behind. This is why Hertog and Hawking insist that their 'top-down' cosmology is testable. Hertog says that the theory predicts the pattern of the variations in intensity of microwave background radiation, the afterglow of the Big Bang now imprinted on the sky, which reveal fluctuations in the fireball of the nascent Universe. These variations are minute, but space-based detectors have measured them ever more accurately over the past several years.

Controversial, to be sure!

Read more here.

A mathematical why of the Big Bang

ReplyDeleteOutline

Let Ui be a set of locations of particles of the universe.

U1xU2x ...... xUix ..... a set of infinite paths

(Cartesian product of sets of urelements).

this set is equal to the void set by the

negation of the axiom of choice.

So there is no more space containing the particles.

The particles collapse on themselves: Big Crunch.

Then Big Bang.

The Big Bang has taken place thus the negation of the axiom

of choice is likely to be considered as a good axiom.

Adib Ben Jebara.

http://www.freewebs.com/adibbenjebara

At the level of elementary particles, time could be stopped

ReplyDeleteThe assumption is that at the level of elementary partcles,

time is the infinite set of urelements U of the set theory

with urelements.

If it can be prevented going from the urelement-time u1 to

u2, time would be stopped.

Time at the level of elementary particles is not the arrow

of time that we know at our level.

As a result of what could be happening at the level of

elementary particles, there might be disturbances of

time in an area, at our level, like slowing down.

Adib Ben Jebara.

http://www.freewebs.com/adibbenjebara