tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6753820.post2841632390325229323..comments2010-07-19T23:38:57.716-04:00Georgehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13003484633933455827george@sentientdevelopments.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6753820.post-59940174198780785562010-07-19T23:38:57.716-04:002010-07-19T23:38:57.716-04:00He will say i feel happy, and act happy but wont be happy?<br /><br />Anybody see the problem?<br /><br />What do we do? we Say we are happy, Let´s check how it happend; we interpret happiness as some thought asociated with a body response, the two of whom are reactions to a word, scene, person etc. Then, after that interpretation we think or say, Im happy. Are we happy? The machine reacts, have a (virtual) body reaction and a thought, the AI thinks Im happy. Would you say the AI is not happy?<br /><br />I believe there is supernatural reminicense in his interpretation of emotion in his essay. <br /><br />http://elfilodelaguadana.tumblr.com<br />http://elespaciodeaparicion.wordpress.comCristianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03983130786590515490noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6753820.post-67992542454286559202010-07-16T16:03:50.768-04:002010-07-16T16:03:50.768-04:00Totally agree. Gelernter starts strong, then concludes weirdly / unconvincingly. Good analysis / systems view, bad final scenarios -- see this often in long-term / AI projections.Alvis Brigishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16168303630787495118noreply@blogger.com